Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Accountants welcome SMSF exemption changes

self-managed-superannuation-funds/financial-services-licence/best-interests/financial-services-industry/SMSFs/accountant/financial-planner/government/australian-financial-services/chief-executive/

28 April 2010
| By By Chris Kennedy |
image
image image
expand image

Accounting industry bodies have welcomed proposed reforms to remove an exemption allowing accountants to provide advice on the establishment or closure of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) without holding an Australian Financial Services Licence (ASFL), provided new regulations are both flexible and in the best interests of clients.

The National Institute of Accountants (NIA) has been expecting these changes for some time and has been in discussions with the Government about the upcoming regulatory changes, according to Vicki Stylianou, general manager of representation and innovation at NIA.

"We accept the situation, what we'd like to see is still having a flexible and cost effective system for accountants," she said.

Given that the first point of contact for most people or businesses seeking SMSF-related advice is their accountant, any sort of licensing regime should be flexible and cost effective to enable accountants to continue to give advice, she said.

A one-size-fits-all solution, such as requiring anyone who provides advice to be RG 146 compliant, would not be in the best interests of all parties, she said

With all the reviews underway at the moment the regulatory burden is "getting to the ridiculous stage," Stylianou said, and any changes needed to be introduced in a coordinated and considered way - rather than being rushed in to suit an election timetable.

CPA Australia chief executive Alex Malley said the CPA was looking forward to working with the Government to develop an appropriate solution.

"We have been of the view that the exemption did not work anyway and needed to be reviewed," he said.

"Many accountants already have arrangements in place, such as holding an ASFL, employing a financial planner in house, or outsourcing or referring clients to a financial planner, in order to be able to provide clients with full investment and financial product advice," Malley said.

"The important issue is that consumers should be able to access simple non-product-specific financial advice from their trusted adviser: their accountant. The recent deferment of the application of the tax agent services regime to financial planners highlights the need for the industry and Government to work together to develop a consistent approach to allow consumers to access basic affordable financial and tax advice across the financial services industry."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND