We’ve never called for a ban on commissions says ASIC

australian securities and investments commission joint parliamentary committee on corporations and financial services Commission Finance Brokers Association

29 January 2018
| By Mike |
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has stepped around giving a direct answer to Parliamentary questioning about the banning of commissions in the mortgage broking space.

Answers to questions on notice posed to the regulator during hearing of the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Corporations and Financial Services revealed that ASIC is not prepared to venture a firm view on the removal of commissions from mortgage brokers – something which would place them on the same footing as financial planners.

The regulator was asked about its response to claims by the Finance Brokers Association that banning commissions for mortgage brokers may lead to brokers being driven out of business, a concentration of power in the banks and a rise in interest rates.

ASIC replied that as it had “not proposed that mortgage broker commissions be banned we have not undertaken detailed analysis about the impact such a ban would have.”

“We also note that the precise impact of any ban will depend on how it was framed, how the market and consumers respond, and any other regulatory changes that are made,” it said.

However, when asked whether the commission environment could be improved, the regulator pointed to its view that the current model “has the potential to encourage brokers to place consumers in larger loans, as commission amounts are generally calculated based on the size of the loan.”

“We have suggested that this risk could be reduced by changing the standard commission model so that brokers are not incentivised purely on the size of the loan,” it said.

ASIC said it also believed the industry “should move away from other bonus commissions and bonus payments: volume and campaign-based commissions and bonus payments to lenders' staff have the potential to contribute to poor consumer outcomes and may place smaller lenders at a competitive disadvantage.”

It said the industry should move away from soft dollar benefits, which were widespread, because these could encourage poor consumer outcomes and place smaller lenders at a disadvantage.

Read more about:


Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry



Planners will be in short supply, with only 376 in FY23–24. In my experience, of this number, only around 20% to 30% wi...

7 hours ago
Peter James

As usual there is no delineation in the article between risk specialist advisers and investment specialist advisers. Thi...

8 hours ago
Mark Harris

Is he serious, improvements from legislation change, all I see is more ASIC compliance and higher costs, this government...

9 hours ago

Insignia Financial has unveiled a new operating model and executive team, including a new head of advice, while three senior executives are set to depart the licensee....

1 week 5 days ago

The $280 billion Australian Retirement Trust is the first superannuation fund off the block to report its performance for the 2023-24 financial year....

3 weeks 1 day ago

Analysis by Chant West of the annual performance of growth superannuation funds has uncovered which ones see the best performance....

5 days 3 hours ago


Fund name
Ardea Diversified Bond F
144.00 3 y p.a(%)
Hills International
63.39 3 y p.a(%)