Treasury defends APRA secrecy on banks

The Federal Treasury has defended legislation which will enable a key financial services regulator, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), to keep confidential any instructions it may give the major banks or other financial institutions during a time of crisis.

The Treasury dismissed concerns raised with the Senate Economics Legislation Committee that the so-called secrecy provision might see the interests of bank shareholders placed ahead of those of depositors.

Answering questions on notice from the committee, the Treasury made clear that the new legislation was intended to allow APRA to keep its directions to banks confidential in certain circumstances, including where public knowledge of an event might cause a run on the banks.

Related News:

It said the confidentiality provisions might help create a short period of “breath space” necessary to achieve an orderly resolution.

“Suggestions in the submissions that these provisions will allow APRA to subordinate the interests of depositors in favour of financial system stability in a crisis are not a correct reading of the legislation,” the Treasury answer said.

“The confidentiality provisions in the proposed legislation only relate to APRA’s ability to determine that an APRA direction should be confidential. This would not detract from APRA’s wider statutory objectives to protect depositors under the Banking Act.”

Related Content

Regulatory data confirms advised life/risk is better

New data has confirmed that people who use an adviser to obtain life/risk insurance are generally better off at claim time.The data, released by the A...Read more

Rowell gets further APRA term

The Federal Government has reappointed Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) deputy chair, Helen Rowell, for another term and has named Tr...Read more

APRA strengthens appointed actuary role within insurers

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released a final package of measures to clarify and strengthen the role of the appointed act...Read more




"Might see the interests of bank shareholders placed ahead of those of depositors".

Wow, this was obviously the case. The only reason they would not want to disclose the instructions given to the banks is because it would have been information which was detrimental to the customers APRA pretends to protect.

Maybe APRA should change the statements it makes on its home page to:
Vision: Protect bank profits at the expense of the community
Mission: Do what the banks tell us to do and give them a leg up wherever possible.
Values: Protect our jobs and try to get more funding whatever the cost and then rely on future positions as consultants to the major banks/investment/insurance companies once we have sucked the consumers dry.

Add new comment