Structured remediation models needed
If banks are serious about rebuilding trust, they should introduce structured remediation processes where independent advice is given to aggrieved customers about what happened to their money and what they are entitled to recover, according to plaintiff law firm, Slater and Gordon.
This approach, which had been used successfully overseas, could involve an independent and qualified third party, such a s a law firm, advising customers on their rights and possible paths forward.
Slater and Gordon, chief executive, John Somerville, said that banks needed to pursue this model if they wanted to both restore trust and avoid a “flow of class actions [that] would likely be relentless”.
"Banks can't expect to say sorry and then dust their hands. If they are serious about making people whole then they need to bring in an independent structure,” Somerville said.
"If there is one thing the Royal Commission has demonstrated it is that the power imbalance between customer and bank is too wide. You can't rely on that power dynamic to deliver justice in the form of fair remediation."
AUTHOR
Hannah Wootton
Recommended for you
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has lowered rates to a level not seen since mid-2023.
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
