RC will force regulation, but less is more

Royal-Commission/wealth-management/RC/David-Murray/Madison-Financial-Group/Annick-Donat/

image
image image
expand image

The consensus across industry experts is that a post-Royal Commission world will involve complete and full disclosure, but more paperwork and onus on the institutions won’t work, a panel has told Money Management and Super Review’s Future of Wealth Management conference.

The experts said while the Royal Commission was much more consumer-orientated than it was originally thought to be, whether consumers were aware of the compliance burdens placed on institutions was “another story”.

“It’s more paperwork into the system … and none of it protects the clients,” added Steve Davis, chief commercial officer, Infocus.

“Somehow, regulators need to understand that less is more, but unfortunately that won’t come out of the Royal Commission.”

When asked if industry funds got off lightly, AustralianSuper group executive, Paul Schroder, said people had forgotten the human impact on those involved.

“The only message I’d like to convey is don’t forget the human impact on the people in this broader financial services industry of this Royal Commission,” he said. “If you’re involved directly its exhausting, and if you work in an institution that’s involved, it challenges and upsets your confidence.”

But other panellists thought they had, with Grahame Evans, managing director, GPS Wealth, telling the conference that industry funds didn’t receive the intensity of interrogation as the other institutions.

David Murray, CEO of Sterling Private Wealth, said industry funds were fortunate because of where the Royal Commission directed its attention in its early stages.

“I think the order has been quite deliberate,” he said.

The experts were hesitant to place onus on the regulators though, with Evans telling the conference that regulators have had to “battle hard” and negotiate against “some really high power”.

Annick Donat, CEO of Madison Financial Group, said it was unfair to judge the regulators against the Royal Commission.

But, all the experts agreed the Royal Commission was timely and necessary, with Schroder indicating that the general public “needed it”.

“It reminds the executives and the boards and owners that it’s not their money,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 2 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

1 week 5 days ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision following this week's monetary policy meeting....

3 weeks ago

A former financial adviser who stole $4.4 million from his family and friends to feed gambling debts has been permanently banned by ASIC....

3 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo