PC: Trail commissions for mortgage brokers should go

Commission commissions mortgage brokers brokers PC

3 August 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
expand image

Trail commissions have been dealt another blow, with the Productivity Commission recommending that they be banned in mortgage broking for all loans originated from the end of 2018 in its final report into competition in the Australian financial system.

The PC recommended reforming mortgage broker commission structures, saying that an enforceable code applying to all mortgage lenders should be created and imposed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

“There is little if any evidence to substantiate the claim that trail commissions are a payment for the ongoing provision of services to borrowers. In practice, trail commissions have the effect of aligning the broker’s interests with those of the lender, rather than those of the borrower,” the report said.

It recommended that the proposed code would implement the following changes to broker remuneration structures:

  • Ban the payment of trail commissions in mortgage broking for all loans originated after end-2018;
  • Require upfront commissions to aggregators and brokers to be paid based on the funds limit drawn down by customers, net of offset, instead of the limit of the loan facility;
  • Ban the payment of volume-based commissions, campaign-based commissions and volume-based payments; and
  • Limit to two years the period over which commissions can be clawed back from aggregators and brokers.

The report also found that that state of competition in the banking system posed issues for the financial system but recommended little in this area.

“Price competition in the banking system is limited. Although institutions claim that they compete in loan markets by discounting, such behaviour is not indicative of a competitive market when price obfuscation is common and discounts are specific to groups of customers,” the PC reported in its findings.

“Australia’s banking sector is an established oligopoly with a long tail of smaller providers … As a result, the major banks have the ability to pass on cost increases and set prices that maintain high levels of profitability — with minimal loss of market share."

The PC characterised the Big Four banks as having a "too big to fail" status, whic reflected an expectation of government intervention should they hit financial difficulties.

Read more about:


Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry



Planners will be in short supply, with only 376 in FY23–24. In my experience, of this number, only around 20% to 30% wi...

5 hours ago
Peter James

As usual there is no delineation in the article between risk specialist advisers and investment specialist advisers. Thi...

6 hours ago
Mark Harris

Is he serious, improvements from legislation change, all I see is more ASIC compliance and higher costs, this government...

7 hours ago

Insignia Financial has unveiled a new operating model and executive team, including a new head of advice, while three senior executives are set to depart the licensee....

1 week 5 days ago

The $280 billion Australian Retirement Trust is the first superannuation fund off the block to report its performance for the 2023-24 financial year....

3 weeks 1 day ago

Analysis by Chant West of the annual performance of growth superannuation funds has uncovered which ones see the best performance....

5 days 1 hour ago


Fund name
Ardea Diversified Bond F
144.00 3 y p.a(%)
Hills International
63.39 3 y p.a(%)