Income securities hit a tax snag
Income securities, which exploded onto the market in 1999, have received a knock back from the tax office which says the securities should not be treated as debt for income tax purposes.
About $6 billion was raised by the likes of AMP, Woolworths and the National Australia Bank, when the income securities were released within a few months of each other in 1999.
The Australian Tax Office yesterday issued two draft rulings on the treatment of income securities.
"The broad effect of the rulings is to not treat income securities as debt for tax purposes," the ATO said in a statement.
Income securities are listed hybrid securities issued by banks and other corporations which pay interest and raise permanent capital in what is claimed to be a tax-effective form.
"That is, they are claimed to be treated as debt for tax purposes, but may be considered to be equity for accounting and regulatory purposes," the ATO said.
The Tax Office said payments made by issuers of income securities were not deductible because they were capital in nature.
"Unlike interest payments on debt, the payments made on income securities represent the cost of securing and retaining permanent capital."
In some cases, the payments may be effectively an application of income derived rather than an expense incurred in deriving that income, it said.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.