FOFA unlikely to increase uptake of financial advice, says survey

smsf-professionals/financial-advice/cent/government-and-regulation/SMSFs/FOFA/SPAA/stronger-super/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/chief-executive/

26 September 2011
| By Tim Stewart |
image
image image
expand image

While the majority of self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) professionals believe the proposed Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes will improve the standard of financial advice, only 14 per cent believe the reforms will see an increase in the uptake of advice.

A Self Managed Super Fund Professionals' Association (SPAA) survey of 360 SMSF professionals found that 57 per cent of respondents believed that FOFA would lift the standard of financial advice.

Eighty-one per cent of respondents believed they would be unaffected by the "best interests" duty contained in the FOFA draft legislation - and a further 64 per cent believed they would also be unaffected by the banning of volume-based payments.

However, while they were well prepared for the FOFA environment, SMSF professionals were concerned about the Stronger Super proposal to ban off-market transfers between SMSFs and related parties.

The majority of respondents (91 per cent) said the ban was unnecessary and would drive up transaction costs for SMSFs.

SPAA chief executive Andrea Slattery said the ban would create an uneven playing field in the superannuation sector.

"SPAA has advocated strongly against the banning of off-market transfers because APRA-regulated super funds (which would not have the same obligations) would have an unfair advantage over SMSFs," Slattery said. 

The SPAA survey also found SMSF professionals were concerned about the Stronger Super requirement for auditors to be registered with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), with 56 per cent of respondents stating that a competency exam would reduce the number of auditors and increase compliance costs.

"SPAA believes SMSF auditors who already undertake 20 or more SMSF audits a year should be exempt from taking a competency exam as a condition of ASIC registration," said Slattery.

When it came to contribution caps, 79 per cent of respondents believed the $50,000 cap for individuals should be restored for those over 50. Additionally, 61 per cent of those surveyed believed SMSFs should have access to a "last resort" compensation scheme if they suffer a financial loss in the event of criminal activity such as fraud or theft. 

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

4 weeks ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

1 week 3 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3