ASIC’s Chester claims chair Shipton was 'opaque' on expenses
If the chair of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), James Shipton had been less “opaque” in providing information to his commissioner colleagues about the payment of his tax advice expenses and the expenses of his deputy, Daniel Crennan, the issue would not have escalated.
That was the evidence of the acting chair of ASIC, Karen Chester who has told the Senate Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services that if there had been less opacity on the part of Shipton “I would not be here today”.
Chester responding to questions from the chair of the committee, Senator James Paterson who directly questioned the ASIC acting chair whether she was implying that responsibility for the Australian National Audit Office’s (ANAO’s) criticisms rested with the chairman.”
“Is that your your view. That this goes to Mr Shipton,” Paterson asked.
Chester said that she believed that if there had been full information provided to the non-recused ASIC commissioners, “I would not be here today”.
She claimed that she and the other commissioners had been informed of the issues but in an “opaque” way.
Chester also confirmed that a late set of documents provided to the ANAO in relation to the expenses issue had originated from Shipton’s personal computer.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
