ASIC won't appeal key Harold Mitchell case
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has made clear to a Parliamentary Committee that it does not intend appealing a key Federal Court decision which saw former Tennis Australia director, Harold Mitchell, penalised $90,000.
Answering questions on notice from the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics, ASIC acknowledged that its decision not to appeal the case was based on its assessment that the prospects of success for an appeal were low.
ASIC said that the decision not to pursue an appeal had not been made by a single commissioner or senior executive but by the Commission collectively sitting in session.
Further, it said that its decision had taken into account the receipt of senior counsel’s advice that considered the judgement in its entirety.
ASIC had pursued action against Tennis Australia vice president Mitchell alleging he had breached his directors’ duties in connection with a 2013 decision by the Tennis Australia Board to award the domestic television broadcast rights for the Australian Open tennis tournament to Seven Network.
Following a five-week trial that concluded in December 2019 the Court found that Mitchell contravened section 180(1) of the Corporations Act on three occasions.
Recommended for you
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has lowered rates to a level not seen since mid-2023.
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
