ASIC acknowledges gaps in robo-advice compliance
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has confirmed its support for robo-advice even though it acknowledges substantial regulatory issues are yet to be resolved.
ASIC chairman, Greg Medcraft has told a FINSIA forum in Sydney today that the regulator sees robo-advice as having the potential to offer a convenient, low-cost advice service to consumers, and to also deliver benefits such as improved compliance and record keeping.
Medcraft also claimed that robo-advice had the potential to reduce conflicts of interest.
However, he acknowledged that the provision of robo-advice raised interesting regulatory issues and challenges including how robo-advice providers could comply with best interests duty and the training and competency of those sitting behind the robo-advice model.
Medcraft also acknowledged that unanswered questions remained about whether robo-advice providers could adequately compensate consumers for poor advice.
He said ASIC had set up an internal Robo-advice Taskforce to look at robo-advice issues, and was discussing the issues with robo-advice providers and those looking to join the space.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
