APRA confirms complexity in Banking Executive regime
Implementation of the Banking Executive Accountability regime is likely to be riddled with complexity especially in terms of accommodating pre-existing arrangements, according to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).
Under questioning during Senate estimates, APRA chairman, Wayne Byres confirmed the challenges confronting the regulator in seeking to implement the new regime announced by the Treasurer, Scott Morrison in the Budget.
Byres said he did not believe the process was likely to be straightforward. “Like all of these things, the devil is in the detail. You are dealing with individuals' employment arrangements and there will be all sorts of complexities associated with things that are already in train that people have entitlements to,” he said.
“There will be a fair bit of complexity in working out how you handle things that are already in place.”
The APRA chairman also pointed to the fact that banks would have to pre-notify the regulator about impending appointment, describing it as a form of registration.
“The second leg is a requirement for institutions that are subject to the regime to map accountabilities to individuals, so it becomes clearer who is responsible for what,” he said.
The third leg is then a set of expectations around how individuals and institutions are expected to conduct their business, and then the fourth component is what you do if people fail to deliver on that, either individually or as an organisation.”
However he made clear that APRA would not be “unilaterally applying penalties” and that matters would be referred to the courts.
Recommended for you
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has lowered rates to a level not seen since mid-2023.
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
