Life advisers must prove need for commissions
Life/risk advisers are going to have to make their case for the retention of commission-based remuneration in the same way that mortgage brokers did, according to the Federal Opposition.
The Shadow Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, made clear that he remains to be convinced about commissions-based remuneration in the life insurance industry but acknowledged the case that had been made by mortgage brokers on the issue.
“Conflicted remuneration is a problem but mortgage brokers have been able to make a case for commissions,” he told an AIA Australia adviser summit.
Jones said that it would be up to life/risk advisers to make a similar case, but that before adopting a firm position he would be awaiting the outcome of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) review into the Life Insurance Framework (LIF).
Asked to define what he regarded as “conflicted remuneration” to be when a product manufacturer paid a fee to the adviser related to the sale of their product – something which had been similarly viewed by the Royal Commissioner, Kenneth Hayne.
Recommended for you
The Federal Court has dismissed a conflicted remuneration case brought by ASIC against the director of life insurance distributor Freedom Group, where Bali holidays and Vespa purchases were among sales incentives.
Policy and advocacy specialist Benjamin Marshan has left the Council of Australian Life Insurers after less than a year, having joined in March from the Financial Planning Association of Australia.
The declining volume of risk advisers meant KPMG has found a rising lapse rate for insurance policies arranged by independent financial advisers, particularly in the TPD and death cover space.
The Life Insurance Code of Practice has transferred from the Financial Services Council to the Council of Australian Life Insurers.
