Insurance commissions drive overselling

commissions insurance life insurance fund manager

1 April 2010
| By By Caroline Munro |
image
image
expand image

High upfront insurance commissions result in dramatic overselling of products to people who cannot afford it, according to former Money Management Financial Planner of the Year Neil Kendall.

Kendall pointed to commissions in excess of $40,000 a year acting as an incentive for overselling.

He recently dealt with a new client paying a $40,000-a-year life insurance premium, yet the client did not even know who the beneficiary was or how those benefits would be distributed.

"They had no idea. It had never been discussed," Kendall said. "The adviser got $43,000 or $44,000 in commission, so they were very focused on getting an insurance sale … but there was no reward for giving good advice."

Kendall said the situation was a testament to one of the fundamental conflicts around insurance commissions.

"If that adviser had said to them they actually don’t need this much life insurance, they need half as much, they would have halved their commission."

Kendall said in this case not only was the client oversold but the insurance was doubled up within the products that were selected. Ultimately, on re-examining the client’s circumstances, Kendall was able to get them adequately insured for a $6,500 premium a year, without paying commissions, by going elsewhere for a better deal.

Kendall said the overselling of risk insurance products was not uncommon, although he conceded this was a dramatic case of a financially naïve person being taken advantage of. He said underinsurance or advisers simply ignoring insurance were much more prevalent problems.

Another Money Management Financial Planner of the Year and life risk specialist Peter Roan also cited an extreme example: an apprentice mechanic had about $400,000 of death and total and permanent disability cover through a super fund, but the only thing covering the premiums was the employer contribution. The teenager’s mother was concerned that his super was being depleted and approached Roan for advice.

"He didn’t need it and he couldn’t afford it," Roan said.

"How did that previous adviser come up with $400,000?" Roan asked, asserting that it had probably been a commission-driven decision.

Roan said change was needed at the dealer group, fund manager and product manufacturer levels as sales targets, incentives, volume bonuses and rebates fell into their domain.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

1 day 15 hours ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

1 day 15 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

2 days 10 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND