van Eyk rejects 19 funds in Aust equities review

9 August 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

van Eyk Research has rejected 19 Australian equities funds in its review of the sector, claiming they were not sufficiently competitive, while awarding five funds its top 'AA’ rating. 

The research house said it looked at a total of 69 strategies as part of its assessment of long-only Australian equities funds. Five funds which were invited to take part declined, alongside the 19 funds which were screened out of the review. 

van Eyk head of manager research Matthew Olsen said the 19 managers screened from the review suffered from one or more of a number of failings including insufficient levels of active risk in the portfolio, which meant the managers and the fund were less likely to create excess return for investors. The funds also displayed insufficient manager skill and an investment process that differed little to the rest of the market. 

Of the funds that were included in the review, five scored an AA rating, 19 scored an A rating, 18 scored a BB rating and three funds scored a B rating, with the managers reviewed showing growth, neutral, value and quantitative investment styles. 

The research house said it was making public the news that one-third of managers were either removed or chose not to participate, as it felt it was necessary to disclose the complete sample from which the recommended funds were chosen. 

van Eyk chief executive Mark Thomas said this would allow users of the research to judge the selective nature of the ratings process and its outcomes. At the same time planners could see what happened to all funds in the review, while fund managers would be discouraged from shopping for ratings with their funds. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

1 day 2 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

1 day 3 hours ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

1 day 3 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND