Sell-off risk if US election result is contested

28 October 2020
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

The risk of a contested result – which could take months to resolve – could lead to a sell-off, according to State Street Global Advisors (SSGA). 

Raf Choudhury, SSGA Australia head of investment strategy and research, said the current risks were hard to price from a market perspective. 

“The risk of a contested result, that could take months to resolve, should not be overlooked; the last time we had a contested election was in 2001 – Bush vs Gore,” Choudhury said. 

“That created a 36-day delay before the US Supreme Court eventually ratified the result which saw Al Gore concede to George W. Bush.  

“By that time it was mid-December and markets had to endure a long period of uncertainty. That uncertainty led to a broad sell off across markets. 

“Not only did US equities – both large and small – fall, but so did non-US stocks. The riskier small-cap equities fell the most, declining by over 7% over that 36-day period; at one point, they were down by double digits.” 

Although Democratic Party candidate Joe Biden was leading in the polls, there was still caution over anticipating the result as Hillary Clinton similarly had a lead in 2016. 

There was also the factor of actual voter turnout, as well as the controversy of postal voting. 

“COVID-19 means we will see a large proportion of postal votes – something Trump repeatedly claimed through the first presidential debate as being rigged,” Choudhury said. 

“He was clearly laying the foundations to contest the result by already questioning the legitimacy of this election.” 

The deciding factor in the election could be the Supreme Court, which now had a 6-3 conservative lean as Amy Coney Barrett replaced the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg. 

“In rushing to fill Ginsburg’s seat, he has had to contend with allegations that his urgency is centered around the desire to get an ally in the Supreme court,” Choudhury said. 

“Should he contest the result, it would need a ruling from the Supreme court as it did in 2001. 

“This is something that the market is keeping a close eye on as the biggest risk if there is a contested election result. That is still a risk despite the widening in the polls in Biden’s favour.” 

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

3 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

3 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

5 months 2 weeks ago

A former Victorian financial adviser has been sentenced after stealing $4.4 million from clients, family and friends to feed his “raging gambling addiction”....

4 weeks 1 day ago

A financial advice firm has been penalised $11 million in the Federal Court for providing ‘cookie cutter advice’ to its clients and breaching conflicted remuneration rule...

3 weeks ago

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed who will succeed Stephen Jones to serve as the Assistant Treasurer and Financial Services Minister. ...

3 days 8 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
93.34 3 y p.a(%)
2
5
Plato Global Alpha A
28.83 3 y p.a(%)