Popular analysis might lead to allocation mistakes
Popular factor analysis tools might lead investors to dangerous allocation mistakes, according to smart beta index provider, ERI Scientific Beta.
Its newest study, “Measuring Factor Exposure Better to Manage Factor Allocation Better: A Critical Approach to Popular Box Initiatives”, found there were several new factor tools promoted by investment market leaders as factor risk analysis standards.
However, most of them could lead to serious misalignment between an investor’s factor diversification objectives and the measured and realised allocation.
The findings of the study indicated that:
- These analytic tools did not employ academically-grounded factors and their factor-finding process maximised the risk of ending up with false factors,
- Non-standard factors led to mismeasurement of exposures and may capture exposure to redundant factors,
- The use of factor scores instead of factor betas for the measurement factor exposures was a cause of concern,
- The major drawback factor scores suffered from “double counting” of exposures, which was due to their lack of regard for the correlation structure of factors.
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Infrastructure assets are well-positioned to hedge against global uncertainty and can enhance the diversification of traditional portfolios with their evergreen characteristics, an investment chief believes.
Volatility in US markets means currency is becoming a critical decision factor in Australian investors’ ETF selection this year.
Clime Investment Management is overhauling the selection process for its APLs, with managing director Michael Baragwanath describing the threat of a product failure affecting clients as “pure nightmare fuel”.
Global X will expand its ETF range of exchange-traded funds next month with a low-cost Australian equity product as it chases ambitions of becoming a top issuer of ETFs in Australia.
