Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

PFA warns that regulation could hurt retail investors

treasury/PFA/Unlisted-property/regulation/retail-investment/funds-management/

3 April 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image image
expand image

The Treasury’s proposal to increase regulation for unlisted property products could lead to fewer products being available to retail investors, the Property Funds Association (PFA) has warned.

The Association, which is the peak industry body for the $125 billion Australian unlisted wholesale and retail funds sector, said that the legislation, which could be enacted this year, would damage both retail investors and the sector as a whole.

“Treasury’s proposed product design and distribution obligations combined with new product intervention powers would lead to consolidation among retail providers of unlisted property funds, and fewer choices for retail investors.”

Increased compliance, uncertainty and costs could make it harder for boutique and mid-market fund providers, potentially leading to more deciding to only sell wholesale.

The PFA pointed to the proposed need for product issuers to identify the ‘appropriate target market’ for their products as an example of a potential stumbling block for product providers, saying that it shifted more risk to them.

“Legislating this requirement places more risk on the issuer and arguably shifts responsibility from the financial adviser to the product issuer,” PFA chief executive, Paul Healy, said.

“Unlisted property funds will need to spend more on compliance, legal advice, and possibly consumer testing to satisfy these requirements. Those funds which do go ahead will be under pressure to pass these increased compliance costs on to investors.”

Healy said that while investors must be protected, this must not be at the cost of product innovation, much of which comes via boutique providers. This was particularly important in the current period of demand from retail investors for unlisted property vehicles.

He also believed that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) already had appropriate tools to protect unlisted property investors.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 days 5 hours ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 week 4 days ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 2 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

6 days 1 hour ago

Libby Roy has been appointed as an independent non-executive director on the board of AZ NGA....

3 weeks 6 days ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3