ESG presents challenge for Asia-Pacific investments

Bell Japan ESG

16 July 2021
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Bell Asset Management has highlighted how difficult it can be to find a company in Asia-Pacific that meets its environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards.

The firm ran a Global Emerging Companies fund but it had just 1.7% allocated to the Asia-Pacific region compared to 29% in Europe and 63.7% in the United States.

It held no companies in Japan, which represented a 10.5% underweight, although this had actually benefitted the fund recently due to Japan’s poor performance. The average ESG rating of Japanese companies was BBB which below the MSCI World Index rating of A.

In a webinar, Ned Bell, chief investment officer, said: “We don’t have much exposure in Asia Pacific, there is not much of the right quality for us. Lots of the companies we see in that region are way behind in ESG.

“They have got better, Europe is the gold standard and US companies are catching up but in Japan especially, they are not great, there is still a way to go for ESG of companies in the smaller universe.”

According to McKinsey, smaller companies in Japan “lag behind” on all three elements of ESG. To improve, the organisation said, they needed to focus on their energy consumption and decarbonisation, on gender diversity and societal impact and lastly, on corporate governance and cross-holdings.

Speaking to Money Management, Bell added: “The ESG disclosure levels of Japanese companies are lacking, there is only a handful of AAA-rated Japanese companies which is somewhat disappointing. As far as emerging Asia is concerned, there are many more problematic companies with controversies that cover a range of ESG issues and governance more generally has been somewhat problematic.

“Companies need to be much more proactive about engaging with investors and research houses on ESG. We would also like to see more comprehensive sustainability reports and a willingness to align themselves with the UN Sustainable Development Goals.”

The Bell Global Emerging Companies fund had returned 29.7% over one year to 30 June, according to FE Analytics, versus returns of 41.2% by30 the sector.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

 
sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

JOHN GILLIES

SO NOW YOU ARE NOT ONLY A FUND MANAGER BUT A MIND READER AS WELL ? (Where it should have considered the orders were man...

15 hours ago
Nathan Baker

That's great. If any loss had occurred and clients eventually sue, that will probably occur after the PI has lapsed. Adv...

15 hours 59 minutes ago
Mark Marshall

It is about time that commentary put forward by the Financial Services industry's middleman is supported with hard facts...

1 day 7 hours ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFS licence of a Sydney wealth firm, the fifth Sydney firm to see a cancellation since the start of the year....

2 weeks ago

A former financial adviser has been banned by ASIC from providing financial services for inappropriate advice, among multiple breaches....

4 weeks 1 day ago

More than 20 winners from the funds management industry have been crowned at this year’s awards....

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND