ESG presents challenge for Asia-Pacific investments

Bell Japan ESG

16 July 2021
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Bell Asset Management has highlighted how difficult it can be to find a company in Asia-Pacific that meets its environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards.

The firm ran a Global Emerging Companies fund but it had just 1.7% allocated to the Asia-Pacific region compared to 29% in Europe and 63.7% in the United States.

It held no companies in Japan, which represented a 10.5% underweight, although this had actually benefitted the fund recently due to Japan’s poor performance. The average ESG rating of Japanese companies was BBB which below the MSCI World Index rating of A.

In a webinar, Ned Bell, chief investment officer, said: “We don’t have much exposure in Asia Pacific, there is not much of the right quality for us. Lots of the companies we see in that region are way behind in ESG.

“They have got better, Europe is the gold standard and US companies are catching up but in Japan especially, they are not great, there is still a way to go for ESG of companies in the smaller universe.”

According to McKinsey, smaller companies in Japan “lag behind” on all three elements of ESG. To improve, the organisation said, they needed to focus on their energy consumption and decarbonisation, on gender diversity and societal impact and lastly, on corporate governance and cross-holdings.

Speaking to Money Management, Bell added: “The ESG disclosure levels of Japanese companies are lacking, there is only a handful of AAA-rated Japanese companies which is somewhat disappointing. As far as emerging Asia is concerned, there are many more problematic companies with controversies that cover a range of ESG issues and governance more generally has been somewhat problematic.

“Companies need to be much more proactive about engaging with investors and research houses on ESG. We would also like to see more comprehensive sustainability reports and a willingness to align themselves with the UN Sustainable Development Goals.”

The Bell Global Emerging Companies fund had returned 29.7% over one year to 30 June, according to FE Analytics, versus returns of 41.2% by30 the sector.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

James Patterson

How much did IRESS pay Deloitte for this analysis? Not sure they are the arbiter of intelligent forecasting in this spac...

21 hours ago
Howard Elton

Article makes no comment that the advisers leaving industry are older and have many years of work an life experience w...

2 days 4 hours ago
Peter Robinson

This article appears to overlook the fact that there must be a fairly large group of advisers who missed out on the expe...

2 days 4 hours ago

ASIC has secured travel restraint orders against a financial adviser while he is the subject of an investigation into alleged financial misconduct....

4 days 22 hours ago

Insignia Financial has unveiled a new operating model and executive team, including a new head of advice, while three senior executives are set to depart the licensee....

2 weeks 2 days ago

Analysis by Chant West of the annual performance of growth superannuation funds has uncovered which ones see the best performance....

1 week 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Ardea Diversified Bond F
144.00 3 y p.a(%)
3
Hills International
63.39 3 y p.a(%)