Active funds underperform: Stockspot
The great debate between active versus passive funds had strengthened, as 77 per cent of Australian active managed funds had underperformed against the index, over a five-year period.
Such was the opinion of Stockspot founder and chief executive, Chris Brycki, who added that even in the United States, 88 per cent of managed funds had underperformed.
It was a poor consistent trend that would continue this year, so advisers needed to do their homework, he said.
"There are so many fund managers competing. It's a difficult equation. Over the last 20 years, the amount of fund managers had doubled, but that doesn't mean that those fund managers can double the market," he said.
The issue was that the fund manager market was saturated.
"They can't [all] beat each other, [possibly why] there had been a lot of money going out of the active market and into exchange traded funds (ETFs)," he said.
"If we put our client's money in active funds, we would be actively losing money for them," he said.
Interestingly, those active funds managers who also recently did well, tended to do poorly going forward, another reason why it was difficult to pick an active fund manager, he said.
Recommended for you
Volatility in US markets means currency is becoming a critical decision factor in Australian investors’ ETF selection this year.
Clime Investment Management is overhauling the selection process for its APLs, with managing director Michael Baragwanath describing the threat of a product failure affecting clients as “pure nightmare fuel”.
Global X will expand its ETF range of exchange-traded funds next month with a low-cost Australian equity product as it chases ambitions of becoming a top issuer of ETFs in Australia.
Flows into Australasian sustainable funds have moved back into outflow territory in the second quarter of 2025 driven by US$400 million in redemptions from passive funds.
