Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Why has the adviser exam fee jumped to $1,500?

ASIC/exam/FASEA/costs/

13 January 2023
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

ASIC has clarified why the cost of sitting the financial adviser exam has increased from $573 in 2020 to $1,500.

When the financial adviser exam was run in 2020 under the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA), the cost was $540 plus GST.

When it was taken over by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the cost increased to $973.

If an adviser wanted an answer re-marked, this would cost $218. Advisers also needed to be registered as a relevant provider and pay a $95 fee.

However, for the 2023 exam dates, the costs had risen yet again to $1,500 per exam sitting.

This was despite the exam moving to an online-only format this year compared to in-person ones.

A spokesperson for ASIC told Money Management the costs of the exam were set by the Government and had risen as a result of the Corporations (Fees) Amendment (Exam Fees) Regulations 2022 in late 2022.

The next exam would be held on 16 February and bookings were open until 30 January.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by LA on Fri, 2023-01-13 09:09

Price gouging at its worst. That's all ASIC is good at, extortionate fees for everything and no service.

Submitted by Ken on Fri, 2023-01-13 10:37

Why don’t you just say You don’t want any old advisers

Submitted by Funny on Fri, 2023-01-13 11:11

Laura, if you are asking a question, perhaps Incompetence or Corruption accounts for the price rise? Suggest you consider becoming a Journalist and find out - or perhaps not?

Submitted by Anon on Mon, 2023-01-16 15:13

So what has been the benefit of the Adviser exam??

Submitted by Anon on Mon, 2023-01-16 15:15

Since giving advisers an exemption to having degree, if they have been in the industry for 10 years, I don't see what the benefit of the Adviser exam was?? It won't help any client.

Submitted by Suqeaky'21 on Wed, 2023-02-01 18:22

Monopolistic arrogance and 'fee for no service' right there. Shameful that a govt clerical department can get away with riding rough-shot over advisers just trying to do their job for their clients. Just get bloody govt in all its forms OUT OF THE DAMN WAY!

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND