What is really ethical?
Consumer advocacy group Choice has released new research that suggests some responsible investment funds aren’t quite as responsible as they make out.
Choice said it had investigated the managers of so-called responsible or sustainable funds and suggested that investors needed to read the fine print when choosing to invest their nest egg in a sustainable or ethical fund.
Choice provided as an example the fact that some superannuation funds allowed investment in uranium mining companies such as BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto into their green options on the basis that such mines produce material for energy and not nuclear bombs and because they get less than five per cent of their revenue from uranium.
Choice spokesman Christopher Zinn said that because there was no commonly agreed definition of “sustainable”, “responsible” or even “ethical” many of the top shareholdings of funds ended up being very similar to the shares held by ordinary investment funds.
“Consumers interested in the responsible investment sector should check a fund’s product disclosure statement for an explanation of its investment strategy and make sure that it fits in with their own views,” he said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Half a year after Count Financial told its advisers to exit several Metrics Credit Partners funds, research house Lonsec has now downgraded two of these products over governance concerns.
Having divested its financial advice business to Fortnum Private Wealth, Australian Unity has shared further details on how it is transforming the wealth arm of the business to focus on investment bonds.
With candidate retention a concern after a professional year, two large licensees have shared how they are structuring their programs to successfully ensure candidates are keen to remain beyond the year.
Evidentia Private has appointed PIMCO’s Haydn Scott as principal for private wealth solutions, focusing on asset consulting and private markets.
