Westpoint head accuses auditor

financial-planners/money-management/federal-court/director/chief-executive/

13 April 2006
| By Ross Kelly |

A senior Westpoint director has accused auditor KPMG of already knowing about the failed developer’s problems before ticking-off its reports.

Richard Beck, a key capital raiser for Westpoint, said he warned KPMG his company was pooling funds from separate developments into a “common pot”.

Beck’s accusations surfaced publicly in a transcript of an Australian and Securities and Investments Commission interview with him, published in The Australian newspaper this morning.

Beck also told KPMG that he thought Westpoint’s Ann Street Mezzanine fund, one of the first to collapse, was raising more money from investors than it had disclosed.

“The response I received [from KPMG] was that everything was properly accounted for in accordance with Australian accounting standards, and [they issued] unqualified reports,” said Beck.

The fresh accusations against KPMG follow Money Management reporting in February that financial planners were seeking legal advice over the role of the auditors of Westpoint in an attempt to recover client funds.

“From our initial investigations, it appears there have been irregularities in the audit reports produced by KPMG, which have obviously influenced the outcome of financial planners’ decisions, as well as the structure of some of the internal arrangements,” Association of Independently Owned Financial Planners chief executive Peter Johnston said at the time.

When questioned by Money Management, KPMG refuted claims there were irregularities in its audit reports.

A spokesperson said: “In situations where companies face financial concerns, it is common for those impacted to ask questions of various parties.

“KPMG is confident of the quality and veracity of our audit work in relation to various entities in the Westpoint group.”

ASIC, meanwhile, has asked the Federal Court in Perth to appoint receivers to investigate the assets of four directors of Westpoint, including Norman Phillip Carey.

“If a receiver is not appointed then the defendants can still deal with assets and take steps to put them beyond the creditors,” ASIC warned the court.

A spokesperson for lawyers Slater and Gordon, which is preparing a series of court actions against financial planners who sold Westpoint products on behalf of investors, said this morning that any action was still some time away.

“It will take some time to analyse questionnaires we have sent out and received from investors,” the spokesperson said.

Slater and Gordon is looking to recover over $200 million from up to 100 planners on behalf of close to 2,000 clients sold Westpoint products.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 11 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo