Westpac’s rating unaffected by money laundering proceedings
The credit rating agency, Fitch Ratings, has said Westpac’s credit rating will not be immediately affected by credit negative proceedings brought to the firm by the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) for systemic non-compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act, as it had been already factored into the bank’s negative outlook.
The agency said it believed the allegations reflected a wider range of weaknesses in internal controls and reporting systems which were already taken into account.
“Fitch believes the alleged failures reflect broader weaknesses in Westpac's current systems and controls, which the authorities have claimed is not unique among Australia's four major banks – whose long-term internal dispute resolutions are all on negative outlook. Westpac is addressing the weaknesses,” the company said.
“The AUSTRAC proceedings are likely to increase costs for Westpac and take up management's time in the short-term, but we believe the immediate impact for Westpac will be manageable.”
On 20 November 2019, AUSTRAC applied to the Federal Court of Australia for civil penalty orders against Westpac, with allegations indicating that Westpac's oversight of banking services provided through its correspondent banking relations was deficient in allowing correspondent banks to access the Australian Payment System without conducting appropriate due diligence.
Also, it said the bank failed to report over 19.5 million International Funds Transfer Instructions (IFTIs) to AUSTRAC, of which the potential costs from fines or settlement have yet to be determined.
“Likewise, we expect any fine or settlement to be manageable if it is one-off in nature,” the agency said.
“By way of comparison, Commonwealth Bank of Australia (AA-/Negative/aa-) agreed to a $700 million after-tax settlement with AUSTRAC in 2018 following proceedings related to the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing law.”
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
