Underperformance not adequately punished
The Australian superannuation fund market has not sufficiently punished underperforming funds, according to new research commissioned by the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees.
The research, undertaken by the Faculty of Economics and Research at the University of Sydney, has pointed to the outperformance of industry funds compared to their retail counterparts.
It said there had been an expectation by policymakers that at some point in time competition would lead to better performing funds being rewarded, but this was not necessarily occurring.
"It would also be heroic to think that such a competitive market is a realistic prospect in the foreseeable future," the research analysis said.
It said this was because the superannuation fund market did not work to equalise returns and this meant sustained differences in performance could continue.
The research suggested that conflicts of interest between fund members and fund managers were structured in different governance models.
However, the principal of research house Chant West, Warren Chant, said the difference in performance between funds was not just about governance but also asset allocation.
He said the exposure of retail funds to listed equities had been a key differentiator in returns.
Chant said the value of liquidity delivered by exposure to listed investments could also not be underestimated.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
