Treasury proposes enforcement changes

australian-prudential-regulation-authority/APRA/insurance/australian-taxation-office/federal-government/treasury/ATO/

5 December 2006
| By Glenn Freeman |

Court enforceable undertakings, the regulators’ disqualification regime and co-operation between the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and professional industry bodies are among the enforcement and other issues addressed in a discussion paper released by the Federal Government.

Pointing out that APRA presently only has the power to accept court enforceable undertakings issued under the Insurance and Superannuation Industry Supervision (SIS) Acts, it proposes that APRA be allowed to “tailor its enforcement action to the situation and have the power to also accept undertakings under the Banking and Life Acts”.

The paper also points out a lack of consistency across prudential Acts in the provisions for disqualification of responsible persons, auditors and actuaries.

“It is proposed that both APRA and the ATO’s [Australian Taxation Office’s] disqualification regime could be enhanced by increasing its flexibility across industries.”

It also said aspects of the current legislation “prohibit the disqualification mechanism from being used in a manner that reflects the nature and severity of the contravention that led to the disqualification”.

With regard to APRA powers relating to the appointment of actuaries and auditors, the paper proposes a bolstering of APRA’s enforcement capabilities in directing an entity to remove a disqualified person.

While this is currently only possible under the Banking Act, the paper calls for provisions allowing APRA to direct a regulated entity to remove an auditor or actuary not meeting “fit and proper requirements” to be inserted into the Insurance, Life and SIS Acts.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

1 week 6 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo