Super funds understating costs
Warren Chant
Many super funds are failing to disclose their true investment costs to members, according to a fees study by researcher Chant WestFinancial Services.
The study estimated “conservatively” that the quoted fees of a typical balanced fund with growth assets of 61 per cent to 80 per cent were understated by as much as 30 to 60 basis points.
“This represents a material difference when you consider that the reported total management costs are commonly in the range of 60 to 80 basis points,” according to director Warren Chant.
The discrepancy is occurring because the “industry as a whole has been steadily increasing its allocation to alternative assets (mainly infrastructure, private equity and hedge funds) through fund-of-funds vehicles”, he said.
“While there is nothing inherently wrong with the fund-of-funds concept, and indeed the diversification it provides reduces manager risk, these funds do introduce a multi-level fee structure.
“Everyone takes their cut.”
Recommended for you
A quarter of advisers who commenced on the FAR within the last two years have already switched licensees or practices, adding validity to practice owners’ professional year (PY) concerns.
Integrated wealth and financial services group Rethink has launched a financial planning arm called Rethink Wealth to expand beyond property investing and into holistic wealth management.
While adviser numbers continue to slowly creep back up, the latest Wealth Data analysis reveals they would actually be in the green for the calendar year if it weren’t for so many losses in the limited advice space.
Iress has appointed a chief AI officer to spearhead the fintech’s strategic focus on AI, with chief executive Marcus Price describing how the technology opens the doors to a “new frontier for wealth advice”.
