Super funds understating costs
Warren Chant
Many super funds are failing to disclose their true investment costs to members, according to a fees study by researcher Chant WestFinancial Services.
The study estimated “conservatively” that the quoted fees of a typical balanced fund with growth assets of 61 per cent to 80 per cent were understated by as much as 30 to 60 basis points.
“This represents a material difference when you consider that the reported total management costs are commonly in the range of 60 to 80 basis points,” according to director Warren Chant.
The discrepancy is occurring because the “industry as a whole has been steadily increasing its allocation to alternative assets (mainly infrastructure, private equity and hedge funds) through fund-of-funds vehicles”, he said.
“While there is nothing inherently wrong with the fund-of-funds concept, and indeed the diversification it provides reduces manager risk, these funds do introduce a multi-level fee structure.
“Everyone takes their cut.”
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
