SRI funds returns lag wider market

fund-managers/

27 June 2002
| By Jason |

By Jason Spits

Investorsin socially responsible investments (SRI) will lose 0.7 per cent per year on their investments compared to mainstream investors, according to a report released last week.

The report, authored by Paul Ali and Martin Gold from Stellar Capital and published in conjunction with the Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation at the University of Melbourne, was designed to see if it is possible to “invest for good” without any financial sacrifice.

The lower return figure was based on analysis of seven years’ worth of returns and tested the effects of omitting shares that operate in industries, which are normally deemed to fall outside SRI funds. These industries include alcohol, armaments, gaming, pornography and tobacco.

In compiling the report, which is the first such analysis of the growing SRI market, the authors state that the size of the market is more than $1.9 billion and with the uptake of SRI strategies by fund managers the forecast for growth is strong.

However, this growth has not been matched by a system to measure either SRI returns or their investment strategies, which has led to significant differences between the approaches to construct SRI portfolios.

To highlight this lack of uniformity, the report says that some funds do not actually exclude companies that are undesirable but rather use a lower weighting of those shares relative to capitalisation in the market.

The report also outlined the level of screening funds use to define their investment portfolios, with 56 per cent using only a negative screen, which simply rejects investments which do not fall into an SRI category.

A third of the market used a mix of positive and negative screens, with the former designed to identify investments that have addressed the issues of the environment or workplace conditions. Only nine per cent of funds used a positive screen solely.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

1 week 6 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo