SMSFs could be drawn into Royal Commission


The SMSF Association has warned that self-managed superannuation funds may get dragged into the Royal Commission into misconduct in the banking, superannuation and financial services industry as industry funds seek to deflect attention.
Out-going SMSF Association chairman, Andrew Gale told the organisation’s national conference that although the terms of reference of the Royal Commission excluded SMSFs, there remained the potential for our sector to be included in the work of the inquiry via three key avenues:
- The Advice and conduct issues of Australian Financial Services Licensees are included specifically in the terms of reference, and this could include SMSF advice and recommendations to establish an SMSF.
- Secondly, with large superannuation funds included in the terms of reference and under scrutiny, we expect the large fund sector, especially industry funds, to seek to deflect attention by pointing out issues with SMSFs. Issues raised could include minimum reasonable account balance sizes for SMSFs and Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements.
- Finally, there is a small possibility that the terms of reference of the Royal Commission are expanded to include SMSFs or related fields.
“On a positive note, it’s worth noting that prior enquiries into superannuation have found the SMSF sector to be functionally well with a high level of compliance,” Gale said.
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?