Small planners beg for FSR clarity

financial services reform compliance australian securities and investments commission director

1 August 2002
| By Nicole Szollos |

Independent, small planning businesses and dealer groups have asked for a clearer set of compliance processes under the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA), removing what is currently viewed as business uncertainty.

In a submission made to the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Corporations & Financial Services in mid-July, Boutique Financial Planning Principals Group president Bruce Baker raised a number of concerns and says business uncertainty is facing practices with only one or two planners, under the FSRA licensing transition.

Baker says the while the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has agreed compliance procedures for smaller businesses will be different to the larger groups, the lack of a clearly defined process is still a concern to independent groups.

ASIC licensing and business operations FSRA director Pauline Vamos says smaller groups should be asking themselves the fundamental questions, such as what needs to be done for compliance, and then developing measures themselves.

According to Baker, the committee shares ASIC’s view that compliance requirements for smaller practices should be approached differently to larger groups.

The committee will hear 33 submissions in total from various industry groups and associations in its inquiry into the regulations and ASIC policy statement made under the Financial Services Reform Act 2001. The next hearing will be held in Sydney on August 7, 2002.

“Our primary initial concern is the significant business uncertainty caused by FSRA — because of the way the rules are written. The big issue is trying to narrow it down,” Baker says.

“Given the vagueness of the way ASIC policies are written, we could be stuck between the two extremes of different ways people are interpreting the rules,” Baker says.

“My impression is that [the committee] will be recommending the prescriptive features of the policy statements be scaled back substantially,” he says.

“Groups are best placed to determine what the measure should be, it needs to be what will work for them. We agree different businesses of size will have different systems in place,” Vamos says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

2 days 4 hours ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

2 days 4 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

2 days 23 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND