Small planners beg for FSR clarity

financial-services-reform/compliance/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/director/

1 August 2002
| By Nicole Szollos |

Independent, small planning businesses and dealer groups have asked for a clearer set of compliance processes under the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA), removing what is currently viewed as business uncertainty.

In a submission made to the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Corporations & Financial Services in mid-July, Boutique Financial Planning Principals Group president Bruce Baker raised a number of concerns and says business uncertainty is facing practices with only one or two planners, under the FSRA licensing transition.

Baker says the while the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has agreed compliance procedures for smaller businesses will be different to the larger groups, the lack of a clearly defined process is still a concern to independent groups.

ASIC licensing and business operations FSRA director Pauline Vamos says smaller groups should be asking themselves the fundamental questions, such as what needs to be done for compliance, and then developing measures themselves.

According to Baker, the committee shares ASIC’s view that compliance requirements for smaller practices should be approached differently to larger groups.

The committee will hear 33 submissions in total from various industry groups and associations in its inquiry into the regulations and ASIC policy statement made under the Financial Services Reform Act 2001. The next hearing will be held in Sydney on August 7, 2002.

“Our primary initial concern is the significant business uncertainty caused by FSRA — because of the way the rules are written. The big issue is trying to narrow it down,” Baker says.

“Given the vagueness of the way ASIC policies are written, we could be stuck between the two extremes of different ways people are interpreting the rules,” Baker says.

“My impression is that [the committee] will be recommending the prescriptive features of the policy statements be scaled back substantially,” he says.

“Groups are best placed to determine what the measure should be, it needs to be what will work for them. We agree different businesses of size will have different systems in place,” Vamos says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

3 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

5 months ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

2 weeks 3 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
93.34 3 y p.a(%)
2
5
Plato Global Alpha A
28.73 3 y p.a(%)