Separate advice costs, say actuaries
The cost of providing financial advice within superannuation should be separated out for superannuation fund performance reporting purposes as part of a broader subdivision of investment and administration costs, according to the Institute of Actuaries of Australia.
In its submission to the second round of the Cooper Review into superannuation, the institute has leant substantial backing to the approach suggested by two of its members - Colin Grenfell and Ray Stevens - involving the subdivision of fees and costs.
The institute submission argues for the administration component of superannuation fees and costs to be referred to as 'superannuation fees and costs'.
It then suggests these 'superannuation fees and costs' include advice costs that are not covered by specific advice costs.
The submission then argues that advice costs that are covered by specific advice be disclosed separately as a third component of fees and costs.
The institute submission acknowledges the likelihood that some funds might seek to manipulate any split of fees and costs to achieve a perceived competitive advantage but argues this could be addressed by the regulator requiring an auditor to certify the appropriateness of the arrangement.
Recommended for you
ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland has detailed the regulator’s intentions to conduct surveillance on licensees and advisers who are recommending managed accounts, noting a review is “warranted and timely” given the sector’s growth.
AMP and HUB24 have shared the areas where they are seeking future adviser growth, with HUB24 targeting adding more than 2,000 advisers to the platform.
Bravura Solutions has appointed a new chair and deputy chair to take over from departing Matthew Quinn, while Shezad Okhai picks up another responsibility.
Two advisers say M&A is becoming a “contact sport” as competition heats up to acquire attractive advice firms, while a lack of new entrants creates roadblocks in organic growth opportunities.
