Senate goes soft on super reform

superannuation guarantee taxation government

1 July 2002
| By Fiona Moore |

The superannuation sweeteners announced by the Government in the May budget have been passed by the Senate, while more fundamental reforms, such as a reduction in the surcharge rate, have been removed from the relevant legislation after failing to gain support from opposition parties.

The sweeteners include regulations to allow relations and friends to make super contributions of up to $3,000 on behalf of a child over a three year period; allowing the Baby Bonus payment to be contributed to superannuation; increasing the deduction limit for personal contributions from $3,000 to $5,000; and allowing working people aged 70 but less than 75 to make personal contributions to super.

The measures were included in the Taxation Laws Amendment (Superannuation) Bill (No.2), which was passed by the Senate with amendments late last week.

According to Challenger head of technical services Alex Denham, while the simpler changes are all good, they do not do anything to address the issues of simplification and adequacy.

“Some of the regulations are completely useless, such as the child contribution,” she says.

While the quarterly payment of superannuation guarantee contributions and the making of personal superannuation contributions non-deductible for those over age 70 got the green light, the Labor party opposed measures in the bill to change the minimum wage eligible for superannuation guarantee entitlements from $450 per month to $1350 per quarter. Also removed from the bill was the plan to reduce the surcharge rate from 15 per cent to 10.5 per cent over three years.

The superannuation guarantee of 9 per cent will also take effect today along with the above changes. This represents an extra $500 in super contributions for someone paid $50,000 per annum.

Denham says while this is an improvement, various modelling demonstrates that even for someone starting out on this level of superannuation guarantee, that it will not generate enough money to retire on.

“A whole review is needed and the pressure is on now. But super has become a huge political issue,” she says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

1 day 8 hours ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

1 day 8 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

2 days 3 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND