Ripoll changes will increase client litigation
If the recommendations of the Ripoll Inquiry are adopted it will become easier for clients to make claims against their advisers, according to corporate lawyer Peter Townsend.
He added that at the moment clients can only instigate litigation if they believe the advice they have received is unsatisfactory — that is, if an inappropriate product has been recommended, if the adviser has been incompetent or if there has been ineffective disclosure.
Townsend said that while it is currently difficult for clients to make claims against their advisers, the Ripoll proposals will place the burden of proof squarely upon advisers.
Townsend warned that if the Government adopts the changes, dealer groups will have to ensure that the client’s expectations and the adviser’s remuneration are both carefully laid out in the client contract.
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
