Ripoll changes will increase client litigation
If the recommendations of the Ripoll Inquiry are adopted it will become easier for clients to make claims against their advisers, according to corporate lawyer Peter Townsend.
He added that at the moment clients can only instigate litigation if they believe the advice they have received is unsatisfactory — that is, if an inappropriate product has been recommended, if the adviser has been incompetent or if there has been ineffective disclosure.
Townsend said that while it is currently difficult for clients to make claims against their advisers, the Ripoll proposals will place the burden of proof squarely upon advisers.
Townsend warned that if the Government adopts the changes, dealer groups will have to ensure that the client’s expectations and the adviser’s remuneration are both carefully laid out in the client contract.
Recommended for you
Licensee Centrepoint Alliance has completed the acquisition of Brighter Super’s annual review service advice book, via Financial Advice Matters.
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
