Reverse mortgages continue to confuse
Nearly 80 per cent of Australians aged 60 and over have heard of reverse mortgages but as few as 40 per cent understand the basic premise of the product, according to the Senior Australians Equity Release Association of Lenders (Sequal).
Released today, the ‘It’s on the House Sequal-RFI Reverse Mortgage Study’ found that this lack of financial education about the product was “holding senior Australians to ransom” in their retirement.
“Overwhelmingly, the study revealed that retirees are not sure what options are available to them to release equity from their home,” said executive director Kieren Dell.
Despite a third of retirees expecting to rely on their home as a source of retirement income, many senior Australians feared myths and misconceptions about reverse mortgages, including falsely believing that they would lose their home title or pension benefits, he said.
“In fact, 28 per cent of seniors held the incorrect belief that a reverse mortgage involved selling a portion of the house to the bank in exchange for money, or that the loan involved compulsory repayments until the borrower passed away.”
Recommended for you
An FAAA recommendation to make PY advisers subject to non-compete clauses would place candidates in a “hostage situation” with their employer and potentially deter new entrants, say commentators.
While the profession struggles to keep up with strong consumer demand, a third of people who have passed the ASIC adviser exam aren’t actively practising, so where is this missing third?
Half a year after Count Financial told its advisers to exit several Metrics Credit Partners funds, research house Lonsec has now downgraded two of these products over governance concerns.
As the advice industry evolves with technology, two business consultants have said successful advice firms will be those which focus on delivering an “experience” for their clients, beyond just a transactional service.
