Removing the financial threshold test
The financial threshold test should be removed, according to Super Consumers Australia and a leading consumer advocacy lawyer, as measuring net worth is an unreliable indicator of financial literacy.
The financial assets test was based on the assumption that people with a net wealth of $2.5 million or gross income for each of the last years of $250,000, automatically had the high level of financial knowledge required to understand complex products.
The definitions of ‘retail’ and ‘wholesale’ clients in chapter 7 of the Corporations Act 2001 were under review in the Australian Law Reform Commission’s (ALRC) inquiry into the simplification of financial services legislation, falling into the Interim Report A which was tabled to Parliament in November.
Speaking to Money Management, Super Consumers Australia policy manager, Franco Morelli, said: “In the context of high capital city house prices and a maturing superannuation system, a lot of Australians may end up being classified as wholesale investors without necessarily having the knowledge required.
“This test needs to be better aligned with people’s actual financial knowledge and sophistication rather than how much money they have. That will require a broader review of the policy settings.”
Morelli said the first steps towards a more adequate system would require financial thresholds to be increased in line with inflation and pegged to the Consumer Price Index going forward.
Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer, Josh Mennen, agreed the way sophisticated investors or a wholesale investor had been classified had been overly weighted towards their financial metrics.
“And so it really loses its practical benefits and what it ends up meaning is that it gets used as a cover to circumvent disclosure and other regulatory obligations when providing financial services to people who actually need to be protected,” he said.
“And that's been a significant problem. And I've acted for a number of people who have been misclassified in that way.”
In his submission to the ALRC inquiry, Mennen recommended there be regulatory requirements expressly requiring financial service providers to give and document deeper consideration of a consumer’s financial literacy, rather than the test being about the consumer’s income and assets.
AUTHOR
Liam Cormican
Recommended for you
Advisers at DOD Bookkeeping, which received an $11 million penalty last week, received as much as 40 per cent of their remuneration via a bonus when clients purchased a property via a SMSF, according to court documents.
Private wealth manager Escala Partners has launched an end-to-end investment platform to strengthen its alternatives capability as clients seek sophisticated vehicles.
Perpetual Wealth Management has hired two advisers from Ord Minnett as part of five hires, just weeks after the rival firm announced it had picked up six from Perpetual Private.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a Perth financial services firm following payments to its clients by the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort after a failed managed investment scheme.
