Regulators warned of compliance over-kill

australian-prudential-regulation-authority/compliance/disclosure/financial-services-sector/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/financial-services-reform/federal-government/superannuation-industry/

5 August 2004
| By Ross Kelly |

By Ross Kelly

THE Federal Government’s top finance industry advisory group — the Financial Sector Advisory Council (FSAC) — is calling on Australia to resist excessive regulation of the financial services sector, while strongly criticising the overlapping consumer protection roles of regulators.

In a report released by the Federal Treasurer, Peter Costello, last week, FSAC claims unnecessary regulatory legislation will hamper business investment opportunities both in Australia and overseas.

The report also calls for an adherence to principle-based rather than rule-based regulation, stating this will result in a relatively simpler and less costly regulatory framework.

While the report rarely mentions any specific legislation, its concerns echo industry complaints about the compliance burden imposed by the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA).

The report also states that the overlapping consumer protection roles between the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and between ASIC and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) are a source of confusion in the industry.

“Recent regulatory changes, while underlining the primary roles of ASIC for consumer protection in the financial system, may have led to the roles of the other agencies becoming superseded to some extent.

“This issue requires further clarification,” the report states.

Other recommendations put forward in the report include a call for further reform in the superannuation industry.

“Superannuation, particularly, requires attention to reduce the opaqueness of the industry through enhanced disclosure and education.

“Some industry sectors, particularly superannuation, remain relatively high cost.

“Removing a number of remaining structural impediments, such as portability rules and lack of fund choice can be expected to encourage further rationalisation and efficiency,” the report says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

6 months 2 weeks ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

1 week 4 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

3 days 4 hours ago

ASIC has banned a former NSW adviser from providing advice for 10 years for investing at least $14.8 million into a cryptocurrency-based scam. ...

4 days 7 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3