Regulator claims value for money



John Laker
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority has acknowledged that the cost of regulation has increased substantially over the past five years but argued that the financial services industry is still getting good value for money.
In a recent address to the Accounting Foundation in Sydney, the chairman of APRA, John Laker, said that APRA’s direct costs were readily observable and had risen significantly over the past five years, a period in which the regulator had been building up its supervisory numbers and capabilities.
“This growth phase is now largely complete,” he said.
“However, relative to the value of assets supervised by APRA, costs have fallen steadily. At below 4 cents per $1,000 of assets supervised, we could hardly be described as a high cost regulator.”
Laker said that where they could be produced, measures of compliance costs needed to be interpreted carefully.
“It is important to separate out ‘real’ compliance costs from those costs which an institution would normally incur in its day-to-day operations as part of doing good business,” he said.
“The incremental resource costs of prudential regulation are the costs of activities that a well-managed and prudent financial institution would not choose to undertake in the absence of regulation.”
Recommended for you
Results are out for the latest sitting of the ASIC financial advice exam, with the pass rate falling for the second consecutive sitting.
Adviser losses for the end of June have come in 143 per cent higher than the same period last year, and bring the total June loss to over 350.
ASIC’s enforcement action is having an active start to the new financial year, banning a former Queensland financial adviser for 10 years in relation to fees for no service conduct.
ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay.