Regulator called on to even entry playing field
One of Australia's corporate regulators has been accused of inconsistency in its policing of new entrants to the financial services space, with smaller innovators unfairly subject to more lax treatment than larger players.
In response to Coles' submission to the Financial System Inquiry, which said regulatory framework squeezed out non-bank players with its tight entry barriers, PayPal compliance manager David Hanna stressed there were significant establishment hurdles in the market, particularly those imposed by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).
However, he said the barriers for smaller players, such as PayPal's stored value card competitors, were in some cases less rigourous.
He said the same barriers should be imposed for all organisations, whether it be banks or Coles or start-ups.
"I think the challenge for APRA is making sure there's like for like," he said.
"As some of these smaller, but growing organisations come to the table, it's important to make sure there's equal and fair treatment of those requirements."
Recommended for you
ASIC has permanently banned a former Perth adviser after he made “materially misleading” statements to induce investors.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made a written order to a relevant provider after it gave advice regarding non-concessional contributions.
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
