Regulator called on to even entry playing field
One of Australia's corporate regulators has been accused of inconsistency in its policing of new entrants to the financial services space, with smaller innovators unfairly subject to more lax treatment than larger players.
In response to Coles' submission to the Financial System Inquiry, which said regulatory framework squeezed out non-bank players with its tight entry barriers, PayPal compliance manager David Hanna stressed there were significant establishment hurdles in the market, particularly those imposed by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).
However, he said the barriers for smaller players, such as PayPal's stored value card competitors, were in some cases less rigourous.
He said the same barriers should be imposed for all organisations, whether it be banks or Coles or start-ups.
"I think the challenge for APRA is making sure there's like for like," he said.
"As some of these smaller, but growing organisations come to the table, it's important to make sure there's equal and fair treatment of those requirements."
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
