Record-keeping obligations to increase

best-interests/financial-advice/financial-services-industry/australian-financial-services/financial-planning/FOFA/stronger-super/ASIC/compliance/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/trustee/

31 July 2013
| By Andrew Tsanadis |
image
image image
expand image

The regulator has put forward a new consultation paper (CP 214) in a move to update the record-keeping obligations for those who provide financial advice to retail clients. 

The move by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) comes as the financial services industry comes to grips with the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) and Stronger Super reforms. 

ASIC flagged the best interests duty as one of the key reforms to come out of FOFA, with Commissioner Greg Tanzer adding that maintaining good-record keeping practices was in the interests of a firm, its advisers and their clients. 

CP 124 outlines the types of records that must be kept, including: 

Records to prove that the licensee and its representatives have complied with the best interests duty 

Records of ongoing fee arrangements  

Copies of documents - such as, fee disclosure statements and renewal notices - that fee recipients must receive for an ongoing fee arrangement, and 

Records to prove the licensee and its representatives have complied with the ban on conflicted remuneration. 

Australian financial services (AFS) licensees would be required to retain a record of the above for at least seven years from the date that the advice is provided, the paper stated. 

“Licensees and their representatives have an opportunity to drive real change in their business’ customer focus as they implement this new obligation, and their record-keeping can help cement that change,” Tanzer said. 

ASIC is also considering whether to impose a specific requirement on superannuation trustees to keep certain records where the trustee provides personal advice to members, which they charge collectively as 'intra-fund’ advice. 

Tanzer said that along with the regulator’s approach to the FOFA and Stronger Super regimes, a measured approach would be taken to the proposed reporting obligations where inadvertent breaches arose, or system changes were underway. 

“Our proposed record-keeping guidance is not designed to impose an additional administrative burden on industry,” Tanzer said. 

“Instead, it is intended to give industry greater certainty about what they have to do. 

“However, where we find deliberate and systematic breaches we will take stronger regulatory action.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo