Qld liquidator admonished by CALDB
The Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board (CALDB) has admonished a Queensland-based registered liquidator, the 19th since 2008 that the board has taken action against.
This follows an Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) investigation into Jonathan Paul McLeod, principal of conduct as a liquidator and a voluntary administrator.
ASIC examined 17 external administrations which McLeod was appointed to during 2008 to 2012. ASIC brought 24 contentions against McLeod, 13 of which were established, seven not established, and four withdrawn.
The CALDB found McLeod failed to:
- lodge with ASIC, on numerous occasions, a report regarding suspected offences as soon as practicable after he became aware of the possible offences;
- provide a remuneration report to creditors;
- properly declare his independence to creditors on numerous occasions;
- properly consider whether he was disqualified from consenting to act as a liquidator; and
- open a liquidator's general bank account within seven days of appointment.
The board, an independent statutory body established by ASIC, since 2008 has taken action against 19 registered liquidators including:
- accepting four enforceable undertakings;
- accepting one voluntary undertaking;
- cancelling six liquidator registrations;
- suspending two liquidator registrations;
- applying to court to have three Melbourne registered liquidators removed as joint liquidators; and
- obtaining court orders prohibiting the re-registration of a liquidator.
Recommended for you
The Financial Advice Association Australia has released its pre-budget submission, including six key items to help reduce the cost of professional advice and increase its accessibility.
Phil Anderson, general manager for financial advice at the FAAA, believes the CSLR levy could reach $100 million if Dixon Advisory complaints are allowed to continue.
Proposed legislative changes to safe harbour duty could result in advisers having reduced professional indemnity costs, a joint submission by seven major licensees said.
With 66 per cent of newly established advice licensees being sole advisers, what are the risks and legal ramifications to consider when taking the plunge into self-licensing?
