Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Planners question independence of advice

australian-financial-services/axa-asia-pacific/amp/director/

26 March 2010
| By Bill McConnell |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian financial services industry is under stress from competing forces, with increased concentration of ownership working directly against the requirements for a greater focus on advisers’ fiduciary duties.

According to Andrew Hewison, director and private client adviser at Hewison & Associates, increased institutionalisation across the industry is influencing the sales process for many clients and causing concerns about the independence of the advice they receive.

“The larger institutions are right now seeing a huge opportunity to make a lot of money by gobbling up financial service practices, and that opportunity is all about selling or distributing product,” Hewison said.

“That model or mindset goes directly against non-commission-based selling advice.”

Ongoing merger talks involving AXA Asia Pacific, NAB and AMP are the latest chapter in the increased concentration of ownership in financial services across Australia. But smaller unaligned practices say they are receiving widespread support from clients concerned about the independence of the advice they receive.

“The clients we see, and are seeing in increasing numbers, are really concerned that the advice they’re getting isn’t independent and they lack confidence that what they’re being told isn’t unbiased,” Hewison said.

“How you unwind [commission-based selling] is an extremely difficult question to answer and getting more so given the increased concentration of ownership,” he added.

FIA Financial Planning principal Brett Handke said clients would always have legitimate questions to ask regarding the independence of advice being offered by institutionally owned organisations.

“[Institutionally owned practices] will always being influenced to sell products that are produced by the bank. I just can’t see how they will transition away from that while they remain owned by a bank,” Handke said.

But a spokesperson from AMP, the second largest planning group in the country, said there were many reasons clients would choose a larger brand over their smaller rivals — not the least of which was the security of the brand.

“Not only can we offer the security of the brand, which can provide great reassurance for client, but we can also offer the support of the entire company and the fact that, as a company, we will always stand behind the advice we give,” the spokesperson said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 day 19 hours ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND