Planners confused on SMSF property advice: PIPA

ASIC compliance financial planning government and regulation self-managed super funds smsf trustees SMSFs investment advice SMSF australian securities and investments commission federal government

15 March 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA) is concerned about the lack of regulation around property investment in Australia, particularly in regards to self-managed super funds (SMSFs).

It said accountants, financial planners and mortgage brokers were tentative about who could legally lead SMSF trustees through the property investment process.

PIPA said that without regulation, financial services professionals were confused about their role and the roles of others within the sector.

"If industry professionals are confused, then what hope does that give us that consumers will navigate this investment channel successfully?" PIPA chair Ben Kingsley asked.

Kingsley said that as more and more Australians launched SMSFs, a lack of appropriate regulation around SMSF property investment was jeopardising the retirement savings of millions.

PIPA called on the Federal Government and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to take some action on the issue.

It said although the majority of accountants and planners would support their clients in making sound investment decisions, a lack of regulation left consumers open to less scrupulous operators such as property spruikers and marketeers.

Despite the good intentions of some, they simply did not have the qualifications to provide sound property advice, Kingsley said.

"PIPA's message to anyone operating in the financial services space where property investment is involved, including self-managed super, is to look after the customer where you are qualified," he said.

Without regulation, the best go-to for property investment advice was a qualified property investment adviser (QPIA), Kingsley said.

"QPIA's are formally educated and qualified to provide advice around property investment and adhere to strict guidelines and codes of ethics which support the best interest of the consumer," he said.

PIPA was committed to seeing regulations imposed, but in the meantime sought collaboration among the industry to improve the professionalism of property investment advice in Australia.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Random

What happened to the 700,000 million of MLC if $1.2 Billion was migrated to Expand but Expand had only 512 Million in in...

2 days 9 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

The judge was quite undrstanding! THEN AASSIICC comes along and closes him down!All you 15600 people who work in the bu...

3 days 6 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

How could that underestimate happen?usually the quote transfer straight into the SOA, and what on earth has the commissi...

3 days 7 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 4 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND