Not all fin services companies need AFS licences: lawyer
Financial services firms concerned about compliance may be better off sharing a licence with other parts of the business, a specialist lawyer says.
While many businesses offering financial services may believe they need their own Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence, this is not necessarily the case, according to The Fold’s senior lawyer, Jaime Lumsden Kelly.
Firms can elect to each carry their own licence or choose one entity to hold the licence and appoint other parts of the business authorised representatives, she said.
“The thing to consider with (the latter) option is which company should hold the licence,” Lumsden Kelly says.
“A holding company that does not itself provide financial services may be a good choice, but it’s not the only alternative.
“When making a decision, you need to be mindful of the fact that the entity that holds the licence will need to undertake monthly cash flow forecasts. They also need to obtain all the authorisations needed for all the financial services offered throughout the group.”
Lumsden Kelly said AFS licences can be a complicated area and companies who are confused should seek legal advice.
Recommended for you
Financial advisers will have to pay around $10.4 million of the impending $47.3 million CSLR special levy but Treasury has expanded the remit to also include super fund trustees and other retail-facing sub-sectors.
Recommendations by the FSC around implementing a practicing certificate framework for advisers would be burdensome and add little value for AFSLs, according to SIAA.
The RBA has made its latest interest rate decision at the the final monetary policy meeting of 2025.
AZ NGA has acquired Sydney-based advice and wealth management firm Financial Decisions, allowing its CEO to step back and focus on providing advice.
