Non-aligned planners growing off back of third party services

25 March 2015
| By Jason |
image
image image
expand image

The number of independent licensees will continue to rise as planners use technology to move out from under the restrictive nature of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms and away from relying on institutions to provide investment and asset allocation tools.

According to Hub 24 managing director Andrew Alcock and head of marketing and distribution Wes Gillett there has been an increase in planners and practices seeking third party investment and dealer services since the introduction of FOFA as a way to move out from under an institutional licence.

Alcock said that FOFA had stifled the non-aligned model and had shut down revenue streams based on investments which had forced some planners to consider joining institutions to maintain revenue streams.

However technology was allowing planners to set up their own model portfolios and managed accounts and offer clients bespoke investments and charge for both the investment and financial planning advice components.

“In the past there were two fee streams planners relied on – advice and product. However FOFA killed product fees but the current technology solutions allows planners to revive that area and is allowing financial planners to act like fund managers and build their own systems,” Alcock said.

“This is driving the push for ‘independence’ because planners can create their own funds, charge fees for them and do so without having to be aligned to any institution.”

Gillett said planners were looking for the freedom to ‘take their own bets’ and were limited by institutional platforms and investment tools with Alcock stating that traditional strategic asset allocations was a model that served the compliance needs of licensees but not the investment goals of planner clients.

“The distribution model has driven the product model and this is now beginning to lead to polarisation in the advice market where planners are part of an open system or part of a closed system,” Gillett said.

“Institutions may have headcount and resources and the FOFA compliance fear has driven some of their growth but true entrepreneurs, even within those groups, will want to run their own show and with the growth of technology will move out and do so.”

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

2 weeks 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 2 weeks ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 week 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo