No action from ASIC on fee consents, for now

ASIC/financial-advice/

6 June 2025
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

ASIC has issued a warning to financial advisers and superannuation trustees to ensure they are complying with client consent requirements when entering into ongoing fee arrangements.

In a statement on 6 June, the corporate regulator said it has granted a limited no-action position in response to a specific issue raised by the advice profession about the inclusion of account numbers in a client’s written consent for the deduction, or arranging of the deduction, of ongoing advice fees.  

ASIC assured it does not intend to take action for breaches of section 962S of the Corporations Act 2001 or section 99FA of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 where written consent to deduct fees under an ongoing fee arrangement is provided between 10 January and 5 September 2025 without including an account number.

This applies where, in the case of superannuation, trustees deducted the advice fees from the member’s account as outlined in the consent.

“Relying on this no-action position does not prevent an OFA terminating under section 962WA where a written consent was not compliant because it did not include the account number,” the regulator said.

It further explained that in order to rely on this no-action position, the financial services licensee or representative must enter into a new OFA with the client and seek a new written consent for the fee recipient to deduct or arrange to deduct ongoing fees, including to cover the period where any fees were deducted under a non-compliant written consent.

“The revised OFA must comply with all the requirements in section 962T of the Corporations Act. If this is not in place by 5 September 2025, the fee recipient must take steps to stop receiving fees,” ASIC said.

Regarding superannuation trustees in particular, ASIC said they should review their processes for the oversight of advice fee deductions and ensure that any written consents comply with the Corporations Act requirements.  

“This no-action position does not prevent third parties from taking legal action in relation to the conduct,” it cautioned.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

1 week 5 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo