Misleading statements cost Westpac and NAB

westpac/ASIC/retail-investors/

17 September 2014
| By Nicholas |
image
image image
expand image

Westpac and NAB have paid penalties for misleading consumers, ASIC has revealed.

Westpac has paid $20,400 in penalties after ASIC issued two infringement notices for potentially misleading statements contained in a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and other promotional material.

The statements were made from July 2013 to May 2014 and related to the investment returns on the Westpac Annuity Deposit, a product offered to retail investors planning for retirement.

ASIC was concerned that Westpac potentially misled consumers by representing that the interest rate — known as the ‘earnings rate' — was calculated on the principal amount invested. In reality, the rate only applied to the balance of the principal which could reduce throughout the term of the investment.

While NAB, the Australian financial services licensee for UBank, has paid $40,800 in penalties after ASIC issued four infringement notices for potentially misleading advertisements.

The penalties relate to potentially misleading advertising of a UBank home loan product.

The misleading representations were made in an advertising campaign that promoted an offer of a $2014 EFTPOS gift card for consumers who obtained a home loan with UBank. The advertisements with headline statements, including ‘The BEST $2014 EVER' and ‘Own $2014' appeared in newspapers, radio and online from late December 2013 to early March 2014 and in digital screens on escalators from late January 2014 to February 2014.

ASIC was concerned that some details of UBank's offer were not disclosed in some of the advertisements and, in others, were not disclosed in a clear and prominent manner. These included:

  • a minimum loan amount of $350,000
  • a requirement to use an electronic settlement process (known as FASTRefi) for refinanced loans
  • all documents to be provided within five days, and
  • a cap on the number of consumers eligible to receive the offer.
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 13 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo