Mind your managers, warns Lonsec
Ratings house Lonsec has urged financial advisers to take particular care when recommending both Australian and international long/short funds and not to assume one fund represents a direct replacement for another.
The warning is contained in the latest Lonsec review of the Australian and international long/short equity sector, which noted that factors such as the maximum short exposure permitted, cash levels, use of derivates, and levels of gearing could vary considerably from manager to manager.
As such, advisers needed to be cognisant of the way in which they intended to utilise selected funds.
Despite the ratings house's warning to advisers to exercise caution, the Lonsec sector review resulted in six funds being awarded the company's highest rating of 'highly recommended', with eight receiving 'recommended' ratings.
The funds to receive the coveted 'highly recommended' rating included the Acadian Global Equity Long Short Fund, the Colonial First State Global Resources Long Short Fund, and the Goldman Sachs JBWere Global Flex Fund, while the Platinum Asia, European, and International Technology Funds were awarded 'highly recommended' ratings in the regional long/short equity universe.
Lonsec said funds rated for the first time included the 5 Oceans World Fund, the Barclays International Share Partial Long/Short Fund, and the K2 Asset Asia Fund, which had received 'recommended' ratings, while the Deutsche/RREEF Global Opportunities Fund had received an 'investment grade' rating, which had subsequently been downgraded to 'fund watch'.
Lonsec said the HFA International Share Fund had been placed on 'fund watch', effective from January 20, "due to Lonsec's increased operational concerns with the HFA Group".
It said this also reflected the rating applied to the HFA Diversified Investments Fund, which was HFA Asset Management's largest fund as at June last year.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
As the industry navigates the fallout from recent product failures, two major AFSLs have detailed their APL selection process and relationship with research houses, warning a selection error could “destroy” a licensee.
The impending retirement of financial advisers in their 50s could see the profession face significant succession challenges over the coming decade and younger advisers may not be the answer.
With a third of AFSLs being solo advisers, how can they navigate key person risk and ensure they are still attractive propositions for buyers when it comes to their succession planning?
A quarter of advisers who commenced on the FAR within the last two years have already switched licensees or practices, adding validity to practice owners’ professional year (PY) concerns.
