Lifespan claims ASIC push is against FSRA

compliance/disclosure/financial-services-reform/ASIC/investments-commission/financial-markets/

5 March 2003
| By Ben Abbott |

Lifespan Financial Planninghas criticised theAustralian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), claiming that its hard line on some compliance procedures may disadvantage consumers and move against the intended benefits of the Financial Services Reform Act.

The comments come in response to a new licence condition imposed last week by ASIC on Lifespan aimed at improving its compliance procedures.

Though fully cooperating with ASIC in regard to the new condition, Lifespan argues the regulator is not balancing the interests of all participants in financial markets.

Lifespan complains that when giving limited advice, including on small investments, ASIC’s requirement for written plans in all cases is not commercially justified.

Ultimately, Lifespan says enforcement of the requirement by ASIC could lead to small investors being unable to afford financial advice due to increased costs incurred by dealers.

Lifespan also says ASIC has as yet been unable to produce policy statements or written guidelines in the area of limited advice.

The groups also says “ASIC’s vague reliance on so called ‘industry standards’, in these areas, is inadequate, and less enlightening than we have a right to expect from the industry regulator.”

The dealer group believes the financial burden of limited advice plans will be felt particularly by planning groups not owned by large institutions who cannot afford to service small investors at an ongoing loss.

Though it is taking its compliance infringements seriously, Lifespan says they are “clearly not earth shattering” breaches.

The dealer says there were a number of cases when small investments were not confirmed in writing and brokerage was only disclosed verbally, against its own prescribed rules, as well as some minor disclosure mistakes.

The new Lifespan licence condition will require the appointment of an independent compliance consultant to recommend improvements and to report to ASIC.

Lifespan says it chose not to contest the licence change for commercial reasons and because an external compliance consultant would add value to its processes.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 10 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo