Licensees wanted remediation ‘opt-in’ says ASIC
A number of financial services licensees have argued that clients should be made to “opt in” to the remediation process surrounding fee for no service, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
In new information uncovered during yesterday’s public hearings of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, ASIC deputy chairman, Peter Kell, said the regulator had faced resistance from licensees on the remediation issue including some firms wanting their clients to “opt-in”.
“So we’ve ended up having, at times, reasonably vigorous debates around the scope of the review and how many licensees should be included,” he said. “We had discussions with some firms who wanted to suggest that a remediation program where consumers had to actively opt in to get remediation was appropriate.”
Kell said this ran counter to ASIC’s view which was that, given the passive nature of many of the fees, “opt-in” would not be the right way to go.
The ASIC deputy chairman also pointed to some firms arguing about the length of remediation programs and “whether a mere offer to conduct an annual review to the client – even if that wasn’t taken up or the client couldn’t be contacted – whether that was sufficient to allow a fee to be charged”.
“All of those issues and more, frankly, have been, at times, in dispute,” Kell said.
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
