Licensees not required to send opt-out letters to clients

24 March 2015
| By Jason |
image
image image
expand image

Licensees are not required to provide letters to financial planning clients informing them that they are being transferred to another licensee with the established practice within the planning sector having no basis under the law.

Radar Results principal, John Birt, said that many planners and licensees had, since 2008, been sending letters to clients when they were transferred in bulk to another licensee under the belief this was required under the Privacy Act.

These opt-out letters also allowed clients to choose to stay with their current licensee if they responded within a nominated time period. Similiar style letters were also in use prior to 2008 by some advisers who were restricted from accessing clients after leaving a licensee unless they had secured written permission to do so.

Birt said that while these newer letters may be used at the time of a sale of a practice or book of clients and provide information about the reasons for the shift and the new adviser it is not required under any law nor is there a specific direction or policy from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission on the matter.

“It seems there is no legal requirement to provide an opt-out letter, but the practice has become so entrenched that people assume there is some requirement. If asked to justify why they are required, I do not believe it could be explained on privacy grounds,” Birt said.

“Some industry experts in this mergers and acquisitions space believe it's a ploy by Licensee's to try and retain some of their planning clients. In reality, very few planning clients ever wrote back or even returned the letters.”

Birt said he had checked with Nicholas O'Donohue & Co Senior Associate – Financial Services, Adrian Lynch, who confirmed there was no regulatory or statutory requirement to provide opt-out and the Privacy Act held no provisions that prohibit a business from selling records containing personal information to another business.

Lynch said this was allowed since the primary purpose for which a client’s information was given was for them to receive financial advice and where this position would not change under a new licensee the existing licensee could disclose and pass on client information at the time of a sale.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

2 weeks 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 2 weeks ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 week 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo